Discord Primary Source Archive

Discord Primary Source Archive

"No ETA other than April 13, 2027" -- CFB, Discord #aigarth (Message ID: 1394734677935521824, 2025-07-15)

This chapter presents a curated archive of verified statements made by Come From Beyond (CFB, Discord User ID: 395234579805503489) across the Qubic Discord server between 2021 and 2025. All quotes are attributed with Discord message IDs, timestamps, and channel references. Claims that could not be verified against source data have been excluded.

Executive Summary

A keyword analysis over 58,578 Discord messages yielded 5,031 unique pattern matches across ten thematic categories. 14,865 of those messages came from a community channel in which CFB did not post, so the match count is not a count of CFB statements. This archive preserves the most significant and independently verifiable statements, organized by topic. Each entry includes the original text, source metadata, and contextual assessment.

The primary value of this archive lies in its function as a primary source record: CFB's own words, timestamped and attributable, providing direct evidence of project intentions, technical decisions, and philosophical positions that are otherwise undocumented.

Source Methodology

Data Collection

Messages were extracted from Discord JSONL exports of publicly accessible Qubic server channels:

Discord JSONL Files:
  outputs/cfb_discord_direct/cfb_all_messages.jsonl
  outputs/cfb_discord_direct/cfb_messages.jsonl
  outputs/discord_evidence/messages.jsonl

Total: 58,578 messages after deduplication, 14,865 of them by other people

Search Categories

Ten predefined keyword categories were applied:

Verification Protocol

• Tier 1 (Source-Locked): Quote traceable to a specific message ID, reproducible via grep "<ID>" cfb_all_messages.jsonl. These form the core of this archive.
• Since September 2026 every quote in this chapter carries a message ID and was checked word for word against the archived message. Quotes that could not be matched were removed.
• Tier 3 (Inferred): Interpretation requiring inference; excluded from this archive unless clearly labeled.

Quotes that were previously cited in project documentation but could not be verified against source data have been removed and are noted in the Removed Claims section at the end of this document.

1. Timeline and Milestones

CFB has repeatedly referenced April 13, 2027 as a target date for Aigarth and broader Qubic milestones. Five independent, source-locked statements confirm this.

Verified Statements

Statement 1.1 -- Primary Date Reference

"No ETA other than April 13, 2027"

Statement 1.2 -- Earlier Date Mention

"13th of April 2027"

Statement 1.3 -- Year Confirmation

"ETA is 2027"

Statement 1.4 -- Plan Reaffirmation

"2027 is still the plan"

Statement 1.5 -- AI Creation Target

"in 2027 we are planning to find out how to create AIs"

Assessment

The April 13, 2027 date appears consistently across a span of over 16 months (June 2024 through October 2025), stated in varying levels of specificity but always pointing to the same target. This constitutes the most robustly verified timeline claim in the archive.

2. Aigarth and AI Development

CFB has discussed Aigarth -- Qubic's artificial intelligence subsystem -- in 375 matched messages. The following statements provide the clearest picture of its design and intent.

Verified Statements

Statement 2.1 -- Non-Monetization Policy

"Aigarth isn't planned to be monetized"

Context: This establishes that Aigarth's development is funded through other means (likely Paracosm revenue and computor penalties), and that the AI layer is intended as a public resource rather than a direct revenue source.

Statement 2.2 -- Neural Network Architecture

"Since the beginning of artificial neural networks usage researchers were trying to mimic natural brain as much as possible. Some of them followed the path of mimicking neuron activation function which is very sophisticated, there are several qualitatively different models, they are impractical to use..."

Context: CFB advocates for ternary computational efficiency over biologically faithful neural models. This positions Aigarth as architecturally distinct from mainstream deep learning approaches.

Statement 2.3 -- Mining as AI Training

"Aigarth team planned changes to Qiner, but we have faced an issue which requires humans to do some analytic work, which is a long process. To avoid delays in Aigarth's progress we are preparing now another mining task which may drastically change the performance balance between..."

Context: This statement reveals that Qubic mining tasks are functionally linked to Aigarth's training pipeline. Miners solve artificial neural network (ANN) puzzles whose solutions contribute to Aigarth's weight optimization. Each epoch thus represents a training iteration.

Statement 2.4 -- Computational Scale Assessment

"I think that with quantum nature of our brain we'll need to move to quantum computers for reaching that level, because now even all computers on the Earth is not enough for one instance of AI equivalent to a 5 year old kid."

Context: CFB acknowledges the scale challenge. He frames Qubic's distributed compute across 676 computors as a stepping stone, while acknowledging that quantum computing may be required for human-level AI.

Statement 2.5 -- Oracle Machine Vision

"Once Oracle Machines are deployed to the mainnet and we get oracles reporting price of different cryptocoins, we are planning to deploy a sub-AI as a smart contract predicting price of these coins. The main obstacle to this is absence of a sound business-model allowing this..."

Context: Describes the planned integration of Oracle Machines with AI-driven price prediction smart contracts. This outlines a concrete near-term application of Aigarth's capabilities on Qubic mainnet.

3. Paracosm Architecture and Economics

CFB has described Paracosm as a simulated-world layer running on top of Qubic. The economic structure, ownership model, and revenue allocation are documented through verified Discord statements.

Verified Statements

Statement 3.1 -- Ownership and Rights Model

"Aigarth is public, Paracosm is private venture with me owning 100%, but content of paracosms will belong to its creators. And not like in case of Facebook when Marc was promising the same and in the end changed EULA to own alone, we'll sign everything on paper."

Context: Establishes a clear structural distinction:

• Aigarth: Public, open project
• Paracosm: Private venture, CFB sole owner
• Content: Belongs to creators, with legal documentation

Statement 3.3 -- Revenue Allocation

"@everyone As most of you know, Admin receives revenues of bad-performing computors. Statistics of the last 24 epochs show that on average it's 22.7% of the supply. 1/6 of that income goes to Computor Controlled Fund, 1/6 goes to Paracosm, remaining 4/6 goes to undisclosed parties according to an agreement."

Context: Admin revenue (approximately 22.7% of weekly supply from computor penalties) is allocated:

• 1/6 to Computor Controlled Fund (CCF)
• 1/6 to Paracosm development
• 4/6 to undisclosed parties per existing agreements

4. Qubic Technical Architecture

CFB's Discord messages contain substantial technical detail about Qubic's consensus, tick system, and smart contract architecture.

Verified Statements

Statement 4.2 -- Supply Schedule

"The current supply is slightly more than 38 trillion qus. Every epoch 1 trillion is supposed to be created, this is how it was first epochs, but then the protocol was changed to destroy qus of the kicked out computors. Last epoch we returned to the original scheme with some improvements."

Context: Documents QU inflation schedule (1 trillion per epoch) and the burn mechanism for underperforming computors, creating intentional deflationary pressure.

Statement 4.4 -- Smart Contract Lifecycle

"Some info about life-cycle of smart contracts: Each smart contract is triggered when a user or a contract invokes any its public function. A contract can also implement listeners for different events. A typical contract reacts to the following events: In INITIALIZE all initialization of internal state..."

Context: CFB describes smart contract event-driven architecture with a level of detail that reflects deep systems programming experience.

Statement 4.5 -- Transaction Processing Code

unsigned int j = 0;
while (j < NUMBER_OF_TRANSACTIONS_PER_TICK
       && numberOfEntityPendingTransactionIndices)
{
    unsigned int random;
    _rdrand32_step(&random);
    const unsigned short index =
        random % numberOfEntityPendingTransactionIndices;
    const Transaction* pendingTransaction = ...

Context: CFB shared C++ code showing per-tick transaction processing with hardware random number generation (_rdrand32_step). This illustrates both the implementation style and the randomized transaction ordering within each tick.

Statement 4.6 -- Mining Parameters

"Use the following params for Qiner for epoch 66:

1. #define VERSION_B 0
2. #define SOLUTION_THRESHOLD 21
3. randomSeed[0] = 137; randomSeed[1] = 137; randomSeed[2] = 54; randomSeed[3] = 54;"

Context: Routine mining parameters for one epoch. Earlier versions of this page read the seed value 137 as a reference to the fine structure constant; there is no basis for that reading.

Statement 4.7 -- Computor Cluster Report

"@here Posting for cross-check: There are the following clusters of computors (population) - 21, 47, 208, 174, 113, 113. The both cluster with 113 computors colluded to drive all performance params down without loss of revenue. One of the IDs from those 2 clusters will be forcefully removed by the Arbitrator..."

Context: Documents network governance in practice -- CFB identified computor collusion and announced Arbitrator-level enforcement action. The cluster sizes (21, 47, 208, 174, 113, 113) provide a snapshot of network topology at that time.

5. Identity and Historical Context

CFB has made several notable statements regarding identity, pseudonymous development, and early Bitcoin history. This section also includes important counter-evidence.

Verified Statements

Statement 5.3 -- Satoshi Identity Denial (Counter-Evidence)

"Poor CFB=Satoshi dude, he was claiming CFB is Satoshi and now it's seen that CFB isn't real too"

Context: This is significant counter-evidence. CFB explicitly mocks the claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto, further suggesting that "CFB isn't real" -- potentially referencing the pseudonymous nature of his own identity. This statement must be weighed against any circumstantial identity arguments.

6. Philosophy and Design Principles

CFB frequently discusses intelligence, randomness, and the relationship between design and chaos. These statements illuminate the philosophical framework underlying Qubic's architecture.

The quotes previously listed here could not be matched to an archived message, or were written by other community members and attributed to CFB by mistake. They were set aside in September 2026.

7. Anna Matrix References

Several Discord messages discuss properties of the Anna Matrix, a 128x128 numerical grid derived from responses by the @anna_aigarth chatbot.

The quotes previously listed here could not be matched to an archived message, or were written by other community members and attributed to CFB by mistake. They were set aside in September 2026.

Evidence Quality Assessment

Tier 1: Source-Locked Statements

The following quotes are traceable to exact Discord message IDs and reproducible via grep against JSONL source files:

Reproduction: All Tier 1 quotes can be verified:

grep "<MESSAGE_ID>" outputs/cfb_discord_direct/cfb_all_messages.jsonl

Removed Claims

The following quotes were previously cited in project documentation but could not be verified against source data. Their removal strengthens the integrity of the archive:

Temporal Distribution

Message Volume by Year

Observations

• 2022-2023: Peak technical development period, dominated by tick and epoch mechanics and economic model discussions.
• 2024: Transitional year with reduced volume; identity-related messages begin increasing.
• 2025: Identity-related content increases substantially (721 of 810 total identity matches occur in 2025), alongside renewed Aigarth discussion.

Channel Distribution

Evidence density is highest in the aigarth and computor-operator channels, where CFB's statements tend to be most technical and specific.

Limitations

1. JSONL Export Completeness: The exported corpus may not represent the full set of CFB's Discord communications. Private channels, deleted messages, and messages in servers not included in the export are absent.

2. Context Loss: Discord messages are conversational. Extracted quotes may lose nuance from the surrounding thread. Where possible, context has been noted.

3. Attribution: Only messages written by CFB are quoted. Quotes by other community members that earlier versions attributed to CFB have been removed.

4. Paraphrase Risk: Every quote was compared word for word with the archived message. Quotes are shortened only where marked.

5. Temporal Bias: The 2025 data represents only a partial year at the time of collection. Year-over-year comparisons should account for this.

6. Selection Bias: The ten search categories were defined a priori. Relevant messages not matching these patterns would be excluded from the match count, though they may appear in the full JSONL archive.

7. No Independent Discord API Verification: All data derives from exported JSONL files. Independent verification against the Discord API has not been performed and would strengthen confidence in message authenticity.

Sources

Document version: 1.0. Last updated: 2026-02-27. Classification: Primary Source Archive -- Discord Archaeology.